Thursday, January 13, 2011

Social Experiment on Racism and Thoughts on White Privilege



Image found here


Anthropology of "Race" is the name of my latest class. I know for a fact that this course will be one of the most important ones I ever take; not just because it's a degree requirement, but because it speaks the very truth that my fellow white students and I need to hear.
The class began with a brief introduction. My professor, who confirmed that she was a white, middle class woman and that, although spent much time living in African and Chinese communities, will never know what racism feels like. She is kind, honest, and genuine; her lectures serve to start discussions so the material really sinks in. After this brief introduction to the course, she showed us a film called The Angry Eye that really opened my eyes. It started out like a poorly edited, 1990's educational film but it turned into something very different. Teacher, Jane Elliott, a dedicated educator, anti-racism advocate decides to film a series of experiments with willing student volunteers. These experiments are dated, of course - Jane Elliott did not create them, but she did use them in a way that proved the existence of racism and white privilege in a way that really hit home. The experiment was created with the intention to separate groups of people - think of Hitler; he separated people into various categories as a way to justify hatred and discrimination.

Jane Elliott is not shy to admit that she used one of the same categories that Hitler used, but a major difference is that Elliott wants to abolish racism and prejudice while Hitler wanted to create more. The categorization that she used in this particular film is based on blue-eyed people and brown-eyed people. The blue-eyed volunteers are placed into a room with their blue-eyed peers, while Jane Elliott sits in a room with the brown-eyed students. Amongst the brown-eyed students are many non-white students. Elliott, who is not afraid to get angry, tells the brown-eyed students to treat the blue-eyed students as if they were not humans, to taunt them and call them "boy" or "chick, baby, hunny" instead of their names. She places eight or so chairs in the middle of the room while the brown-eyed group sits in chairs surrounding them - similar to a jury setting.                                                             

The blue-eyed students are ushered in, with green collars made of paper around their necks to signify that they are indeed "blueys", as Elliott stated. This was yet another way to illustrate a lack of power for the blue-eyed, white students. Jane hassles one of the white women about not bringing supplies to class and tries to get her to list out various words in order and recall them. She continues to badger her and asks the same questions over and over. The young woman starts to get angry and talks back. The teacher ignores this and so eventually the woman gets so upset that she began to cry. The non-white students look at the white woman as if they had known it all too well. There is not the same shock in their eyes as their white classmates, who look very defensive.


The woman remains in class as Elliott moves on with the experiment. A young blonde woman sits and stares as Elliott asks her to read text from a sign. The signs on the walls regurgitate old racial absurdities such as "Only Brown Eyes Need Apply", "I'm not prejudiced, I don't see color" and various others. Elliott begins to interrupt the woman, telling her to speak more clearly. Bitterly, Elliott tells the woman that she is failing the task and just as the other white woman; she tries to snap back at the teacher. Elliott continued anyway. Finally, the woman starts to cry and walks out of the room. Shortly after, the woman returns to the room and sits near the door. Elliott looks at the woman and says, "You exercised a freedom that many people can't." She advises her that she has to apologize to every person in the class or she will have to leave. The woman appears desperate, but stands up and states, "I'm sorry, but the racism in our society..."Elliot interrupts her, reminding her that her apology was not genuine at all. The woman leaves the class.

The white students look shocked. The non-white students start to say things that sound unbelievable. A black woman from the crowd says something along the lines of, "She just walked out of here, we don't have the power to do that, it's not like she was having things thrown at her, or having people call her names."  Another black woman says something like, "Now they see what I go through every day."

Immediately, my realization kicks in, all I can think is, "Teachers throw things at their students? Since when?!"

After the film, my brain could not comprehend the material right away. But then it hit me. I realized that I would have not handled the situation well either, I realized that I had a whole lot of white privilege that I hadn't even known about. By this I mean, if I had been one of the white women, and if this was when I was younger, I likely would have acted that way, too. I would have gotten all defensive, snobby and angry. In high school, I was oblivious to privilege and power in society; I was oblivious to a lot of things.
In my opinion, that experiment taught students the truth. The truth being that society is racist in so many ways. It's not just the school system - it's the prison systems, the government and other major institutions.  It illustrates what it may feel like to be treated like a non-human. Obviously an experiment where the people are in no real danger is not anywhere near similar to what non-white people have gone through because of racism. Nevertheless, I believe that if white people just took their heads out of their asses, they could make some changes.

This experiment is a perfect example with problems with power in our society. The white-students displayed such ease in "talking back" to the teacher. They knew they were physically safe, yet they stormed out of the class. They knew they were not in any real danger. That in itself reveals just how much privilege white people have, not to mention middle class, heterosexual white people.

Another view that I took away from this film was surrounding the idea that class and race play a central role in privilege and oppression in our society. For example, if you put a black male and a white male together in a room, who would you say has more privileges in our society?  You're right; the white male has more privilege. This can also pertain to women; we would state that a white, middle class feminist has far more privileges than a non-white woman, or even a white woman who is of the working class. There are far more examples, for instance: sexual orientation and gender identity. A lesbian woman has far less privileges than a homosexual male, for example. However, if you are intersex, transgender or two-spirited you will have much less privileges than a white heterosexual male or a white class-privileged homosexual male.

This is the multi-layered and multi-faceted system of oppression, which in my opinion, needs to be brought down.

Finally, I hope you all can check out Jane Elliott's experiments and other works. It was really an eye-opener to actually see this scenario play out in a real life situation, on purpose. If you would like to watch the video, I can provide some links to possible clips. I'm not 100% sure if they will work, or if they are in full, but it's worth a shot!

Here is a clip from the film



6 comments:

  1. There's a reason why you would've reacted badly. Elliot's experiments are just abusive, nothing else. There is no psychological parallel between being subjected to impersonal forces of societal racism and being subjected to direct verbal barracking and belittling, one-to-one, with somebody looking you in the eyes while they're doing it. Minorities are more likely to earn less and be considered less attractive, however this is not the same experience psychologically as being put in a room and continually devalued and victimized in a way that is both overt and shameless, without anyone even feeling the need to be subtle about what they're doing (at least in real life people pay lipservice to anti-racism). Direct, inquisitorial verbal ssaults - the type of browbeating you'd expect from an aggressive cross examining lawyer - are pretty much the exception when it comes to how racism is expressed. Elliots' "experiment" is just an exercise in interpersonal abuse and how people would react to *that*, it doesn't have a great deal to teach anybody about what it's like to suffer insidious racism.

    ReplyDelete
  2. The,

    Do you see a problem in putting white privileged students, who volunteered to be in an experiment about how it feels to be treated like you have no power? Something most of these kids have never experienced before?

    Seriously? Interpersonal abuse? Did you watch the video? She actually breaks in between and talks about what she just did or said and everyone discusses it and makes realizations.

    Maybe you should watch it, but thanks for the armchair psychology.

    ReplyDelete
  3. "She actually breaks in between and talks about what she just did or said and everyone discusses it and makes realizations. "

    Ya, in a totally directed and authoritarian way. I know a thing or two about how controlled questioning works. I thought you majored in psychology or something? Thanks for the dismssive non-reponse. If you're happy to use abuse to teach people a lesson about what injustice is there's not much more to say to you.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Firstly, Who are you and how do you know about my majors? I am NOT a psychology major, but have studied it extensively in the past.

    No one is forcing you to stay here or comment, I actually should not have even allowed the comments since well, you don't have enough courtesy to leave a name or a link which is strongly encouraged on my comment policy.

    It is authoritarian, but that was the point. To steal power for an experiment. Key point to make here. I think you are failing to realize that this is an experiment; it lasted a few hours and then it was done and many of the students said they understood how their friends felt about racism more so than when they entered the experiment.

    So, if one, who volunteers and consents to a social experiment, learns a great lesson about racism, then what is your goddamn qualm?

    ReplyDelete
  5. Wow this was a really fascinating read hey, THE is obviously short for THE DICKHEAD

    ReplyDelete
  6. Yeah, so I'm quite late to the conversation.
    Thank you for the link to the clip, through it I found a video that I think showed the whole thing. (51 minutes or something like that.)
    I think there is some truth to what "The" said in that it is abuse. Of course the point is that this abuse is comparatively mild and temporary, but it is painful nonetheless and I would certainly have cried.
    If I had been there, I would have been put in the brown-eyed group, though I have white privilege. Growing up Jewish, a third generation holocaust survivor, I hope that I would have had the presence of mind to stand up and object to the mistreatment in this exercise. I would want to make the point that even though I am not in the stigmatized group, I stand in solidarity, be a "righteous gentile." I'm not sure I would, though, as that would risk being singled out by this teacher and subject to the verbal abuse, and I may not be strong enough to take that risk willingly.
    It's interesting to note that the teacher focused the worst, most concentrated vitriol on female students. Maybe she did so because she saw herself in the girls and wanted to affect them the most, but this ignores the fact that these girls were more likely than some of the (straight) male students to already have experienced a degrading power differential.

    ReplyDelete

Total Pageviews